Contextual frequency effects in phonetic variation

Kamil Kaźmierski

June 2024, University of Vienna

kazmierski-vienna2024.netlify.app

Zipf’s brevity law : More frequent = shorter

Frequency and phonetic variation

Higher frequency → process more likely

  • t/d deletion in American English (Gregory, Raymond, Bell, Fossler-Lussier & Jurafsky 1999)
    • and I, bit more
  • reduction of Spanish syllable-final /s/ to [h] to Ø (Brown 2009)
    • ¿Cómo es[h]s[ø] tú? ‘How are you?’
  • reduction of New Mexican Spanish syllable-initial /s/ to [h] (Brown 2004)
    • s[h]e ponía a cuidar ‘would take care’

Contextual frequency and phonetic variation

Higher frequency in favoring environment → process more likely to occur

Word-final /s/ voicing in (central) Mexican Spanish

  • unos[z] amigos ‘some friends’
  • more likely before voiced consonants: regressive assimilation, cf. PL nos Darka [nɔzdaɾka] ‘Darek’s nose’, facebook [ˈfejzbuk]
  • words with higher proportion of occurrence before voiced consonants (e.g. debemos ‘we should’) (=higher FFC) voice more often than words with low FFC (e.g. posadas ‘Christmas parties’)

Informativity (=average unpredictability)

Predictability: home course vs. home furnishings

Informativity: scrappy vs. tough

Words predictable from the following word [=in favoring context] are shorter

Are words typically predictable from the following word shorter in all contexts?

(cf. Seyfarth 2014)

English

β = 0.025, p < 0.001

Polish

β = 0.02, p < 0.001

Prevocalic /t/-glottaling

what I saw

[ʔ aɪ sɔː]

Ex. 1: Intervocalic /t/ as a glottal stop

Ex. 2: Intervocalic /t/ as an ‘incomplete’ glottal stop

Before consonants [=in favoring context], glottaling is common

Are words typically followed by consonant-initial words more likely to undergo glotalling even before vowels?

(cf. Eddington & Channer 2010)

Word-final /r/-vocalization

river, car

[ˈrɪvə, kaː]

I got this kid, used to live right across from my father’s [ˈfaːðəz] gas station. Probably one of the best car [kaː] thieves, you’ve ever [ˈɛvə] known in your [jə] life. He could get in a car [kaː] and steal that car [kaː] faster [ˈfæstə] than you could get in it with your [joə] key. I take him up to Fall River [ˈrɪvə]… And I parked [ˈpaːkt] my car [kaː] in the lot. I said to the kid, “All right cross the street,” I says, “I want a four-door car [foə doə kaː].”

Before consonants [=in favoring context], /r/-vocalization is more likely

Effect of local context

Are words that typically occur before consonants more likely to undergo /r/-vocalization, even before vowels?

No effect of global context

  • Informativity ✅
    • Words that are typically unpredictable are longer
  • /t/-glottaling ✅
    • Words that are typically followed by consonant-initial words are more likely to undergo t-glottaling
  • /r/-vocalization ❌
    • No effect of typically ocurring before consonant-initial words found

Discussion 1/3

Implications for speech production

No place for FFC effect in standard models of speech production

  • abstract representations
  • modular
  • feed-forward

Discussion 2/3

Implications for phonological representations

Perhaps multiple phonetically-rich exemplars of words stored?

/wʌt/

Discussion 3/3

Researcher degrees of freedom

  1. Operationalization of FFC
  1. Details of statistical testing
  • Only FFC vs. both FFC and lexical frequency as predictors in models (cf. Seyfarth 2014)
  • what is the actual ‘effect’: effect of FFC or of the interaction of FFC with frequency (cf. Forrest 2017)

Outlook

FFC testable on most (all?) variable word-boundary processes

  • French liaison
    • petit ami [pətitami] ‘boyfriend’
  • linking-r in non-rhotic English varieties
    • together again [təˈgeðərəˈgen]; AT r ein [fyʁaɪn]
  • pre-sonorant voicing in Poznań-Cracow Polish
    • sok malinowy [sɔg malinɔvɨ] ‘raspberry juice’
  • prevocalic voicing in Rhineland German
    • mit uns [mɪd ʊns] ‘with us’
  • << Your idea here >>

Thank you!

kazmierski-vienna2024.netlify.app

kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl